Tokenization as a force for good
We believe tokenization can broaden access to financial investment products and help create a more inclusive investment ecosystem.
DigiShares provides flexible, white-label infrastructure for the issuance, management and potential trading of tokenized real-world assets. Our technology is built around openness, interoperability and client choice, without locking organizations into a closed vendor ecosystem.
Our principles influence how we build the platform, select technology partners and help clients develop sustainable tokenization businesses.
Infrastructure that adapts to your business, not the other way around.
We believe tokenization can broaden access to financial investment products and help create a more inclusive investment ecosystem.
We develop interoperable, customizable and integratable technology for white-label applications. Open APIs enable clients to extend, modify and connect the platform to their existing technology.
We work with open standards that are not owned or controlled by a single industry participant. Clients should retain flexibility when selecting providers, standards and ecosystem partners.
We focus on what we do best: white-label issuance, investor management and trading infrastructure. We collaborate with specialist providers across payments, KYC, e-signing, legal and marketing to support a strong end-to-end offering.
DigiShares combines institutional-grade functionality with deep customization, predictable commercial models and the flexibility to work with a broad ecosystem of technology and service providers.
Developed through years of work with regulated capital-markets organizations, real-estate developers, fund managers and investment platforms.
Customize the user experience, workflows and integrations or build on top of the platform through APIs.
Connect custody, KYC, payment, e-signing and trading providers according to the needs of each project.
Tokenization platforms can differ substantially in flexibility, commercial structure and operational maturity. The comparison below highlights the areas organizations should evaluate when selecting long-term infrastructure.
| Capability | DigiShares | Typical alternatives |
|---|---|---|
| Functionality | Extensive functionality developed through years of work with regulated capital-markets clients, large real-estate developers, fund managers and investment platforms. | Comparable institutional-grade functionality and a proven market track record may be limited. Reaching this level generally requires years of iteration with active clients. |
| Customizability | White-label and API options. The UI and UX can be extensively customized, and the platform can be integrated into other applications and technology environments. | White-label capabilities, UI customization and API options may be more limited. |
| Pricing model | A commercial structure designed to support scalability and predictability, with competitive onboarding, subscription and offering-based fees. A lower-cost SaaS option is also available. | Some providers charge transaction fees based on trade value or individual blockchain events, creating less predictable costs. Higher onboarding, monthly or capital-raising fees may also apply. |
| Vendor lock-in | Supports open security-token standards and integrations with multiple KYC, e-signing, payment, custody and trading providers. | May require clients to use a specific standard, provider, infrastructure stack or trading venue. |
| Secondary trading | Supports integrations with regulated trading platforms and relevant trading infrastructure. | May lack these integrations or require use of the provider's own trading venue. |
| Partner network | Works with an extensive network of specialist legal, technology, payment and capital-raising service providers. | Some platforms attempt to provide specialist legal or capital-raising services internally, even when these services fall outside their core expertise. |
| Custody | Supports self-custodial, custodial and hybrid configurations through a range of providers. | Custody configurations and provider selection may be more limited. |
| Subscription process | Supports an automated investor subscription process with integrated payment flows and connectivity to supported payment providers. | Processes may remain partly manual and may lack integrated payment-provider connectivity or automated reconciliation. |
| Investor classification | Supports dynamic investor classifications and workflows, including retail versus accredited and domestic versus foreign investors. | May offer less granular classification and fewer options for adapting the onboarding process to different investor categories. |
| Deal page | Deal and offering pages can be extensively customized with media, documentation and custom layouts. | Page structure, presentation options and customization may be limited. |
Extensive functionality developed through years of work with regulated capital-markets clients, large real-estate developers, fund managers and investment platforms.
Comparable institutional-grade functionality and a proven market track record may be limited. Reaching this level generally requires years of iteration with active clients.
White-label and API options. The UI and UX can be extensively customized, and the platform can be integrated into other applications and technology environments.
White-label capabilities, UI customization and API options may be more limited.
A commercial structure designed to support scalability and predictability, with competitive onboarding, subscription and offering-based fees. A lower-cost SaaS option is also available.
Some providers charge transaction fees based on trade value or individual blockchain events, creating less predictable costs. Higher onboarding, monthly or capital-raising fees may also apply.
Supports open security-token standards and integrations with multiple KYC, e-signing, payment, custody and trading providers.
May require clients to use a specific standard, provider, infrastructure stack or trading venue.
Supports integrations with regulated trading platforms and relevant trading infrastructure.
May lack these integrations or require use of the provider's own trading venue.
Works with an extensive network of specialist legal, technology, payment and capital-raising service providers.
Some platforms attempt to provide specialist legal or capital-raising services internally, even when these services fall outside their core expertise.
Supports self-custodial, custodial and hybrid configurations through a range of providers.
Custody configurations and provider selection may be more limited.
Supports an automated investor subscription process with integrated payment flows and connectivity to supported payment providers.
Processes may remain partly manual and may lack integrated payment-provider connectivity or automated reconciliation.
Supports dynamic investor classifications and workflows, including retail versus accredited and domestic versus foreign investors.
May offer less granular classification and fewer options for adapting the onboarding process to different investor categories.
Deal and offering pages can be extensively customized with media, documentation and custom layouts.
Page structure, presentation options and customization may be limited.